The High Court allowed the bail application of two elderly accused-petitioners who were not named in the FIR, deeming it just and proper to release them on bail without expressing an opinion on the merits, subject to furnishing a bond and sureties.
Enlarged the accused-petitioners on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:51169]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13734/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
12/12/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:51169]
[CRLMB-13734/2024]
there is no allegation against them of causing any injury to the injured-complainant party; they are in custody since 15.10.2024 and both of them are old aged persons, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /212
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners who were not named in the FIR and are elderly persons.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nathulal S/o Ramkishan
Smt. Sushila W/o Nathulal
State Of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
