Dismissed

Hemant Kumar Jain v. Rohit Kumar and Ors.

Rajasthan HC12 Jul 2023WCP/484/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted permission to withdraw connected writ contempt petitions (Nos. 470/2018, 481/2018, 482/2018, 483/2018, 484/2018, and 492/2018). Consequently, the contempts were dismissed as withdrawn because the petitioners alleged compliance with the earlier order.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw; contempt petitions dismissed as withdrawn.

Hemant Kumar Jain Vs Rohit Kumar and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:20977]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

(1) S.B. Writ Contempt No. 470/2018

¶4

Bhawana Upadhyaya D/o Shri Devi Lal Pande, R/o House No. 101, Upadhyaya Wara, Village-Post Bamaniya, Tehsil Salumber, District Udaipur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Shri Rohit Kumar, The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

Shri P. Kishan, The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner

¶9

State Of Raj. Through Its Secretary, Dept. Of Education, Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

(2) S.B. Writ Contempt No. 481/2018

¶13

Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Dhul Ji, R/o Shri Ram Colony, Near Nathelav, Tehsil And District Banswara.

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

Shri Rohit Kumar, The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶17

Shri P. Kishan, The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.

¶18

State Of Rajasthan Thorugh The Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur Raj.

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

(3) S.B. Writ Contempt No. 482/2018

¶21

Parvati Sharma D/o Shri Bhagwati Shankar Sharma, R/o Near Data Mandir, Dariyawad, Tehsil Dariyawad, District Pratapgarh.

¶22

----Petitioner

¶23

Versus

¶24

Shri Rohit Kumar, The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan,

(2 of 3)

[2023:RJ-JD:20977]

[WCP-470/2018]

Jaipur.

Shri P. Kishan, The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.

¶30

The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶31

----Respondents

¶32

(4) S.B. Writ Contempt No. 483/2018

¶33

Pallavi Jain D/o Shri Subhash Chandra Jain, R/o Vpo Barodiya, Tehsil Bagidoura, District Banswara.

¶34

----Petitioner

¶35

Versus

¶36

Shri Rohit Kumar, The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶37

Shri P.C. Kishan, Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 3. State Of Raj. Through Secretary, Dept. Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Raj, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶38

----Respondents

¶39

(5) S.B. Writ Contempt No. 484/2018

¶40

Hemant Kumar Jain S/o Shri Rasik Lal Jain, R/o Bawalwara, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur.

¶41

----Petitioner

¶42

Versus

¶43

Shri Rohit Kumar, The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶44

Shri P. Kishan, The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner

¶45

State Of Raj. Through The Secretary, Dept. Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Department, Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur.

¶46

----Respondents

¶47

(6) S.B. Writ Contempt No. 492/2018

¶48

Rajendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Nathu Lal Yadav, R/o Vpo

¶49

(3 of 3) [WCP-470/2018]

¶50

[2023:RJ-JD:20977]

¶51

Choukhaia, Via Barodiya, Tehsil Bagidoura, District Banswara.

¶52

----Petitioner

¶53

Versus

¶54

Shri Rohit Kumar, The Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶55

Shri P. Kishan, The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.

¶56

State Of Raj. Through Its Secretary, Dept. Of Education E, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶57

----Respondents

¶58

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Singh Rathore for Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : -

¶59

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶60

Order

¶61

12/07/2023

¶62

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these contempt petitions, as due compliance of the order under consideration has been made.

¶63

Permission granted.

¶64

The contempt petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶65

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶66

169-174-Ramesh/-

Hemant Kumar Jain v. Rohit Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Kumar Jain v. Rohit Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ambuja Cements Limited Vs Smt. Kamli Devi

Prakash Chandra Khinchad Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratan Singh Khandelwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Kumar Yadav Vs Rohit Kumar and Ors.

Parvati Sharma Vs Rohit Kumar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Vs Rohit Kumar and Ors.