Disposed

Surendra Singh Ratnu v. Kuldeep Ranka and Ors.

Rajasthan HC3 Aug 2023WCP/1317/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur disposed of two connected contempt petitions. The Court found that orders dated 03.03.2022 permitted the petitioners to join duties, rendering the contempt petitions infructuous and discharging the notices.

What did the court decide?

Contempt notices discharged and petitions disposed of with liberty to take appropriate remedy if grievances persist.

Surendra Singh Ratnu Vs Kuldeep Ranka and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:24712]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Writ Contempt No. 1316/2017

¶4

¶5

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6647/2013

¶6

Mool Singh Charan S/o Shri Hari Singh Charan, Resident Of Vishnu Nagar, Near R.t.o., District Jodhpur.

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

Mr. Kuldeep Ranka, Chairman And Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Jaipur.

¶10

Mr. Umardeen Khan. Executive Director Transport, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Jaipur.

¶11

Mr. Lal Chand Chandak. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

Connected With

¶14

S.B. Writ Contempt No. 1317/2017

¶15

¶16

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6646/2013

¶17

Surendra Singh Ratnu S/o Shri Hari Singh Ratnu, Resident Of Mogra Khurd, Tehsil Luni, District Jodhpur.

¶18

----Petitioner

¶19

Versus

¶20

Mr. Kuldeep Ranka, Chairman And Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Jaipur

¶21

Mr. Umardeen Khan, Executive Director Transport, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Jaipur

¶22

Mr. Lal Chand Chandak, Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.

----Respondents

[2023:RJ-JD:24712]

[WCP-1316/2017]

(2 of 2)

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Shashank Sharma for Mr. Harish
		Kumar Purohit

¶28

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶29

Order

¶30

03/08/2023

¶31

Learned counsel for the respondent – Corporation submits that the petitioners have been allowed to join duties at the respective Depot, which is evident from the order dated 03.03.2022, as such, the contempt petitions have been rendered infructuous.

¶32

The copy of the order dated 03.03.2022 produced by the learned counsel for the respondent – Corporation is taken on record.

¶33

Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.

¶34

Both the contempt petitions are hereby disposed of, while giving liberty to the petitioners to take up appropriate remedy, if any of their grievance persists.

¶35

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶36

125-126-Mak/-

Surendra Singh Ratnu v. Kuldeep Ranka and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Singh Ratnu v. Kuldeep Ranka and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen Godara Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Kumar Jakhar Vs the State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Ruchi Ojha Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Govind Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jahan Ara Vs State of Rajasthan