In this contempt petition, the respondent submitted that necessary compliance with the impugned order was made. Consequently, the High Court held that no case of contempt was made out, dismissed the petition, and dropped the proceedings.
Contempt petition dismissed; proceedings dropped; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:43235]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 1290/2018
Navin Kumar Choubisa
----Petitioner
Versus
Naresh Pal Gangwar
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukesh Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tarun Joshi (through VC)
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/12/2023
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
89-Zeeshan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a case of contempt is made out against the respondent given that necessary compliance has been made with the challenged order.
Whether the petitioner can avail legal recourse afresh in case any issue survives the dismissal.
Navin Kumar Choubisa
Naresh Pal Gangwar
DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
