the appellant-applicant vide impugned judgment. It is further submitted that from the statements of the prosecution witnesses, it can be gathered that the fatal injury was caused by co-accused Kanji and not by appellant-applicant. It is also submitted that as a matter of fact, on sudden provocation, quarrel took place between brother and father of the co-accused wherein both the parties received injuries including co-accused Kanji and the appellantapplicant. It is argued that there was no intention of the appellantapplicant to commit murder of the deceased, but during free fight, a grievous fatal injury was received by the deceased, which resulted into his death. It is further submitted that the appellantapplicant is a lady and she was on bail during trial. Learned counsel has submitted that hearing of the appeal preferred on behalf of appellant-applicant is likely to take time. It is, thus, prayed that the sentences awarded to the appellant-applicant by the trial court may be suspended.