accusation was dependent upon the veracity of the evidence of test identification parade as well as upon the testimony of the person who identified the appellants as assailants, therefore, the quality of the above evidence must be of sterling worth so as to ensure the conviction. Herein this case, right from the day of apprehension of the appellants, they were not kept veiled, which is very much evident from the arrest memo whereon their colored photographs are affixed. Simply a formality of writing of mentioning that the accused were kept veiled will not sufficeint to establish that proper course has been adopted. The witness was not clear and firm with regard to the number of the accused rather he failed to identify some of the accused who were apprehended by the Police. There is no recovery of any identifiable article. The appellants were on bail during the course of trial and never misused the liberty so granted to them. He further submits that they have strong arguable case in their favour. In view of the bleak type of evidence relied upon the learned trial Judge, it is prayed that since the hearing of the appeal would likely to take a long time, therefore, they may be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.
