Two-judge High Court bench allowed an application for suspension of sentence pending disposal of appeal. The appellant had served over six years in custody, and the court ordered suspension subject to security and personal bond.
Application for suspension of sentence allowed; bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:23690-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No.
1090/2023
In
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.194/2023
Jagdish S/o Shri Nathulal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Dungrali, Police Station Itawa, District Kota (Raj) (Presently Confined In District Jail Kota)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Ms Alka Bhatnagar, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
18/09/2023
[2023:RJ-JP:23690-DB]
[SOSA-1090/2023]
(2 of 2)
months. It is also contended that PW.2 is not a reliable witness. There are many contradictions between his statement recorded before the police and that given before the Court. It is further contended that recovery has not been proved. Disposal of appeal will take time.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
HEENA/25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow suspension of sentence given the period of custody and delay in appeal disposal
Jagdish S/o Shri Nathulal
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
