Single judge bench dismissed the accused-appellant's suspension of sentence application in a criminal case, declining to entertain it based on the victim's age and allegations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No.1001/2023
In
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.172/2023
Usman Son Of Aftab, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Iradtan Nagar, Neeto Wali Gali Bazar, District Agra(U.P.) Presently Residing At House No. 667, Khatiko Ka Mohalla, Jhalana Police Station, Malviya Ngagr, Jaipur(Raj.)
(At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Alka Bhatnagar, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
11/08/2023
[SOSA-1001/2023]
(2 of 2)
Doctor has also opined that her age was between 17 to 18 years and the possibility that she was above 18 years of age cannot be ruled out. It is further contended that there is no DNA report to connect the appellant with the alleged offence.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Keshav/17
Usman Son Of Aftab
State Of Rajasthan
Ghanshyam Mahawar Son Of Shri Mishri Lal
BHUWAN GOYAL
PANKAJ BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
