This special appeal filed against the dismissal of writ petitions concerning recruitment qualification recognition was dismissed. The bench, following a coordinate bench's decision in Surbhi Thakuriya, held that no case for interference was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:40092-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1042/2023
Mamta Rani D/o Gurdayal Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Lalana Bass Utarada, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order
15/12/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JP:40092-DB]
[SAW-1042/2023]
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
Rmathur/51
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the dismissal of writ petitions regarding recruitment qualifications be allowed given the coordinates bench had already dismissed similar appeals.
Whether the appellant is entitled to be deemed qualified based on the judgment in Laxmi Saroj case despite the result being declared with delay by the University.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Laxmi Saroj vs. State of U.P. & Ors.Referred¶26
Laxmi Saroj vs. State of U.P. & Ors. : AIR 2023 SC 120 · Who else cites this
Surbhi Thakuriya vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶27
Surbhi Thakuriya vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.760 and 762/2023
Mamta Rani
The State Of Rajasthan
Vikash Kumar
Mehaddin Khan Goria
Suman Batesar
Sapna Bhambhu
ARUN BHANSALI
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
