The High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition seeking the production of the petitioner's daughter. The Court found that the corpus had entered into a married life and wished to stay with her husband, rendering the petition devoid of force.
The habeas corpus petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 131/2023
Mohan Lal S/o Vijay Lal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of 8, Shreeram Tila Rajeev Nagar, Ward No. 65, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur, Shastri Nagar, Rajasthan-302016.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prince Brar for Mr. Manoj Sheoran For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Malwal For State : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Asstt. Govt. Adv. Ms. Rashi Dogra Dudi, (S.P.), D.C.P. Jaipur, (North) with Mr. Vinod Kumar, C.I., SHO Police Station Bhatta Basti, present-inperson.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
01/06/2023
[HC-131/2023]
(2 of 2)
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/11
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the habeas corpus petition seeking the production of the daughter was maintainable after she wished to stay with her husband.
Whether the explanation for the absence of the SHO was acceptable to the Court.
Mohan Lal S/o Vijay Lal
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Home Secretary
The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur
The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur
The Station House Officer, Police Station Bhatta Basti, Jaipur
Ganesh Nayak S/o Unknown
Pankaj Bhandari
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
