The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a Quarry License. The court held that since the petitioner submitted the required consent letter only after the license was cancelled, it was appropriate not to interfere with the impugned orders.
The writ petition was dismissed and pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/008814]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8352/2006
Mahesh Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Agrawal, C/o B.l. Vaishnav Marble, Near Railway Quarters, Makarana, Distt. Nagaur, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Dasharath Singh S/o Shri Mohan Singh.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kedar Solanki for Mr. Lokesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Zakir Hussain, AGC with Mr. Ajay Khandal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
01/05/2023
[2023/RJJP/008814]
[CW-8352/2006]
(2 of 3)
06.12.2004 before the concerned authority. It was also submitted that the respondents did not serve adequate/due notice(s) upon the petitioner as required under the Rules of 1986 and therefore, for violation of natural justice, the impugned orders need to be set aside.
“cgl lquh xbZ ,oa izkIr rF;kkRed izfrosnu ,oa i=kofy;ksa dk v/;;u dj euu fd;k x;kA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 17-0304 ,oa 24-04-04 dh ikyuk esa [kfu vfHk;Urk us fnukad 16-05-2004 dks psruk i= tkjh djds 45 fnu esa jktLFkku iznw"k.k fu;a=.k e.My ls vukifRr izkIr djds is'k djus gsrq fy[kk x;k A fnukad 24-05-2004 dks [kfu vfHk;urk dk;kZy; esa jktLFkku iznw"k.k fu;a=.k e.My us dSEi Hkh j[k fdUrq izkFkhZ us vkosnu izLRkqr ugh fd;k A fnukad 16-05-2004 ds vkns'k dh ikyuk ugh djus dkj.k fnukad 09-11-2004 dks [kfu vfHk;Urk us vkns'k tkjh djds Dokjh ykbZlsUl fujLr dj fn;k A fnukad 16-052004 dks uksfVl dh rkehy izkFkhZ dks pLik djds djkbZ xbZA iznw"k.k fu;a=.k e.My dh lgefr fnukad 06-12-2004 dks izLrqr dh tks vkns'k fnukad 09-11-2004 ds fujLrh vkns'k ds ckn izLrqr dh xbZA bl izdkj izkFkhZ us uksfVl fnukad 16-05-2004 ds uksfVl dh ikyuk le; ij ugh dh ftlds vk/kkj ij vkns'k fnuakd 09-11-2004 ls Dokjh ykbZlsUl
(3 of 3)
[2023/RJJP/008814]
[CW-8352/2006]
fujLrh dh dk;Zokgh dh xbZ tks mfpr gSA [kfu vfHk;Urk ds vkns'k fnukad 09-11-2004 esa n[ky dh vko';drk ugha gsA vr% izkFkhZ dh mDr fjohtu [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA ”
Therefore, in light of the submissions made above, it was prayed that the present writ petition be dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Pooja /73
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the cancellation of a Quarry License due to belated submission of a consent letter after the license was already cancelled.
Whether the violation of natural justice principles warrants setting aside the impugned orders regarding the mining concession.
Mahesh Kumar Agrawal
State Of Rajasthan
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
