Disposed

Mahesh Garg Son of Sh. Kanhiya Lal Garg v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Feb 2023CW/779/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against demand notice dismissed. Court accepted parties' submission treating notice as show cause notice and allowing response within four weeks, with consequenial proceedings withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted four weeks to respond to the notice; consequential attachment proceedings withdrawn; writ petition disposed of as submitted.

Mahesh Garg Son of Sh. Kanhiya Lal Garg Vs State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/002133]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 779/2023

¶4

Mahesh Garg Son Of Sh. Kanhiya Lal Garg, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of 88, Gopal Vihar I, Shree Gas Agency Wali Gali, Police Line, Kota.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Finance (Excise) Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Commissioner, Excise Department, Udaipur.

¶9

District Excise Officer, Kota.

¶10

Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. (Rsbcl), Through Managing Director, Vitta Bhawan, (D-Block, Ist Floor), Janpath, Near Vidhan Sabha, Jaipur.

¶11

Rajasthan State Ganganagar Sugar Mills Limited, Head Office Jaipur, Through Managing Director, 4Th Floor, Nehru Shankar Bhavan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.P. Singh, AAG with Mr. Chandra Vikram Singh

¶14

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶15

Order

¶16

08/02/2023

¶17

Learned Additional Advocate General, at the outset, submits that the demand notice/order impugned and under challenge in this writ petition may be treated as show cause notice to the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner may file his response/reply/representation against this notice/order within a period of four weeks from today whereupon, the respondents

[2023/RJJP/002133]

[CW-779/2023]

(2 of 2)

shall proceed in accordance with law. Learned AAG further submits that all consequential proceedings including attachment order, if any, in pursuance of the demand notice/order in the instant writ petition shall stand withdrawn.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the aforesaid submission and prays that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶23

In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of submission made by the parties.

¶24

The pending application also stands disposed of accordingly

¶25

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶26

LAKSHYA SHARMA /12

Mahesh Garg Son of Sh. Kanhiya Lal Garg v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Garg Son of Sh. Kanhiya Lal Garg v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nawal Kishore Meena Son of Shri Ramsingh Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Sharma S/O Goverdhan Lal Sharma B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahavir Singh S/O Shri Man Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Tikaram Sharma S/O Gopalram Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagirath Son of Muknaram Adopted Son of Balluram Vs State of Rajasthan

Radheyshyam Prajpat S/O Late Shri Goverdhan Vs State of Rajasthan