The Single Bench disposed of the writ petition and stay application by following the directions issued in an identical matter (S.B Civil Writ Petition No.10695/2018), dismissing immediate consideration without deciding on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 752/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O. P. Sangwa
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
17/01/2023
(2 of 2)
[CW-752/2023]
“It is further contended that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioners, within a time frame, in the light of the adjudication in the case of Mukesh Kumar Khatik (supra),which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive ventilating the grievances raised in the writ application.
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the Staterespondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed of.”
the petitioners is disposed of in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Gopiram Gurjar (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
270-SunilS/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner's writ petition and stay application by following the directions given in S.B Civil Writ Petition No.10695/2018.
Whether the petitioners' request for similar relief based on identical issues should be granted.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gopiram Gurjar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶19
S.B Civil Writ Petition No.10695/2018 (Gopiram Gurjar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.)
Dinesh Reniwal
Arvind Kumar Reniwal
State Of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
