petitioner sought quashing of an order allotting land to Gram Panchayat and better allotment of land. Court held the order was a policy decision unalterable under writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and dismissed the petition.
Petition to quash the date 04.08.2020 order and direct allotment of other land dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 596/2022
Kamal Saini Son Of Shri Gopal Saini, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Ramnagar Colony, Jaipur Road, Malpura, District Tonk (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
22/11/2023
following prayer:-
(2 of 2)
[CW-596/2022]
vacate in the residential area (aabadi) or around the Gram Panchayat Brijlal nagar residential area within periphery of 1 kilometer instead of earlier allotted land bearing Khasara No. 906/654;
(iii) Any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favor of the petitioner. ”
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
MR/Ayoush/80
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere in a policy decision taken by respondents for allotment of land.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamal Saini
State Of Rajasthan
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
