Revati Raman Chaturvedi v. State of Raj and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was held infructuous due to the petitioner's counsel's admission. Consequently, the petition and all pending applications were dismissed.
The writ petition was held infructuous due to the petitioner's counsel's admission. Consequently, the petition and all pending applications were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:37128]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 576/2010
Revati Raman Chaturvedi son of Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged about 24 years, R/o Ward No. 22, Behind Panchayat Samiti Office, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Judgment / Order
01/12/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statements made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, all other pending application/s, if any, also stands dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
DIVYA SAINI /154
Revati Raman Chaturvedi
The State of Rajast
The Project Director, National Rural Medical and Health (NRHM)
The Director, State Institute of Health & Family Welfare
The Registrar, Rajasthan Pharmacy Council
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court