Writ petition seeking to quash an order defining a khal or naka was disposed of solely because the Government Counsel assured respondents would hear the regularization issue on the same day and maintain the status quo until then.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2) [CW-5665/2023]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5665/2023
----Petitioners
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. NR Budania. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Ms. Abhilasha Bora,AGC. |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/05/2023
(2 of 2)
[CW-5665/2023]
Ganganagar and respondent No.2 may further be directed to not to close the Naka in question. ii) Any other appropriate writ or direction necessary for justice be issued.”
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
80-/Jitender//-
Jagdeep Singh
Pratap Singh
Paramjeet Kour
State Of Rajasthan
Executive Engineer, Water Resources South Division, Sri Ganganagar
Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Circle, Sri Ganganagar
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
