Disposed

Dasrath Sharma v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Apr 2023CW/5219/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposes of PIL regarding encroachment on public street in village Babra. Holds petitioner must submit representation to District Collector/PLPC per Jagdish Prasad Meena. PLPC to decide within 6 months. Writ disposed allowing challenge to adverse order.

What did the court decide?

Representation to submit to District Collector for PLPC action; writ petition disposed allowing appeal against PLPC order.

Dasrath Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan — Public Procurement and Tenders | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/010719]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5219/2023

¶4

Dasrath Sharma S/o Shri Gopal Ram, Aged About 32 Years, Village Babra Police Station Ras District Pali (Rajasthan).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, The Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

District Collector, Pali District Pali Rajasthan. 3. Public Land Protection Cell, Through Its District Collector Pali District Pali Rajasthan.

¶9

Tehsildar Raipur, District Pali Rajasthan.

¶10

Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Babra Tehsil Raipur District Pali Rajasthan.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripudaman Singh.

¶13

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶14

Order

¶15

19/04/2023

¶16

The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayers:-

¶17

“i) By An appropriate Writ Order Or Direction to the respondents to remove the encroachment situated in the street of ward no.4 of village Babra Tehsil Raipur District Pali.

¶18

ii) By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to restore the public land while removing the encroachments, and restore the public street.

¶19

iii) By An Appropriate Writ Order Or Direction the Respondents May Kindly Be Directed To Consider The

[2023/RJJD/010719]

[CW-5219/2023]

(2 of 4)

Application Pending In PLPC Cell District Pali Rajasthan.”

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner has shown the order passed by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in the case of D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9510/2022 (Mahendra Pal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 12.07.2022.

¶25

Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019 wherein this Court directed as below:-

¶26

“This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/ land of ‘johad’, ‘talab’/ river/river bed/public way/Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.

¶27

In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to

(3 of 4)

[2023/RJJD/010719]

[CW-5219/2023]

periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short ‘PLPC’) for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/ representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub DivisionalOfficer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken against the trespassers. The complaints/representations received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking order, informing the respective complainant/representationist about the action taken. This would obviate the necessity of such complainants/ representationists approaching this Court directly by way of public interest litigation. If this practice is put in place, this Court would not be inclined to directly entertain such public interest litigation or would do so only in the event of inaction on the part of the concerned PLPC. The PLPC aforementioned shall also keep in view the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others Vs. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396wherein all the State Governments of the country were directed that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorised occupants of the Gram Sabha/GramPanchayat/Poramboke/ Shamlat land and the same must be restored to the Gram Sabha/ Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. The said scheme should provide for the speedy eviction of such illegal occupants, after giving them a showcause notice and a brief hearing. It was further held therein that long duration of the illegal encroachment/occupation of land or huge expenditure in making construction thereon or political connections of trespassers are no justification for regularising such illegal occupation. Regularisation should be permitted only in exceptional cases where lease has been granted under some government notification e.g. to landless labourers or members of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes or where there is already a

(4 of 4)

[2023/RJJD/010719]

[CW-5219/2023]

school, hospital, dispensary, ‘shamshan’, ‘kabristan’ or other public utility of the like nature on the land.”

¶36

Thus, the petitioner is relegated to submit a representation to the District Collector concerned, who shall assign the matter to the PLPC constituted under the directions of this Court.

¶37

The PLPC shall have a thorough enquiry conducted into the representation of the petitioner in light of the directions given by this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (Supra) and decide the same within a period of six months from the date of submission thereof.

¶38

In case, any adverse order is passed, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the same as per law.

¶39

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶40

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR), J.

¶41

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶42

11-Jitender

Dasrath Sharma v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dasrath Sharma v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Lal Chanwariya Vs Adjudicating Authority

Shri Shyam Educational Institute Vs State of Rajasthan

Friends Primary Teacher Traning Institute Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Chandra Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Fateh Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalpesh Vs State of Rajasthan