Smt Vidhya Devi and Anr. v. U O I Ministry of Transport Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition was dismissed in default as no appearance was marked on behalf of the petitioners at the hearing.
This writ petition was dismissed in default as no appearance was marked on behalf of the petitioners at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4777/2012
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Karnani for Mr. Vikas Soni Mr. Gaurav Gupta for respondent No.3
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
17/01/2023
Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise. However, learned counsel for the National Highway Authorities has submitted that there is an alternative, efficacious remedy available under Section 3G (5) of National Highway Act, 1956.
(2 of 2) [CW-4777/2012]
Considering the fact that none has marked their appearance on behalf of the petitioner, this court deems it appropriate to dismiss the matter in default.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default. Pending applications, if any stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/50
Smt. Vidhya Devi, Wife Of Shri Mata Deen; Smt. Bai Devi Wife Of Shri Ram Niwas; Smt. Moorti Devi, Wife Of Shri Nahar Singh
Union Of India
That Manager, National Highway Authority Of India
Prabhu, Son Of Hardeva
The Competent Authority Land Acquisition, National Highway No. 8, Additional District Magistrat
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court