Nema Ram Bambhaniya v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:19725]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4728/2014
Nema Ram Bambhaniya S/o Shri Fakira Ram Bambhaniya, Aged 43 years, R/o Ward No.20, Old Meghwal Ka Mohalla, Jaisalmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vimal Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anurag Shukla
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
05/07/2023
withdraw the present writ petition.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
18-AbhishekS/-
Nema Ram Bambhaniya
State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, PHED, Jaipur
Principal Secretary, Local Self Bodies, Jaipur
Director, Local Self Bodies, Jaipur
Chief Engineer (H.Q.) PHED, Jaipur
C.E.O. Nagar Nigam, Udaipur
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court