Single Judge ordered the dismissal of a writ petition challenging a selection process for Assistant Fire Officer. The court held that the petitioner, having participated without objection, is estopped from later questioning the method or outcome.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/003906]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4191/2023
Shaitan Meena S/o Hanuman Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Fire Station Quarter No.1, Khoja Babadi, Jaipur Road, Tonk Pin-304001 (Raj.)
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shaitan Meena, in Person For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
09/03/2023
[2023/RJJP/003906]
[CW-4191/2023]
(2 of 2)
Therefore, the selection process cannot be believed to be proper and relied upon for selection of candidates.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN /8
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a candidate who participates in a selection process without demur can later challenge it due to defects in the physical examination process.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Madras Institute of Development Studies Vs. K. SivasubramaniyanReferred¶21
[(2016) 1 SCC 454] · Who else cites this
Ashok Kumar V State of BiharReferred¶21
[(2017) 4 SCC 357] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaitan Meena
State Of Rajasthan
The Director, Local Self Government
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
