The High Court of Rajasthan held that the writ petition had become infructuous and dismissed it accordingly based on submissions by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/008676]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3765/2014
Het Ram S/o Shri Manohar Lal, By caste Bishnoi, aged about 62 years, R/o Sector No.6, B-46, Hanumangarh Junction, Tehsil & District Hanumangarh
----Petitioner
Versus
Both by caste Bisni, R/o Khajuwala, Tehsil Khajuwala, District Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RC Joshi
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI Order
05/04/2023
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
writ petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
(DR.NUPUR BHATI),J
49-amit/-
Het Ram S/o Shri Manohar Lal
Jagdish Chandra S/o Manoharlal
Harish Chandra S/o Manoharlal
Sheela Devi W/o Ram Kumar
Kamlesh W/o Ram Gopal
Kalawati W/o Injderjeet
Nupur Bhat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
