The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission, without detailed reasoning or citation of any precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3393/2020
Suresh Chandra Jat S/o Sh. Rameshwar Prasad, Aged About 40 Years, R/o B-81, Parsvanath Colony, Ajmer Road, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Agrawal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
10/08/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that this civil writ petition has been infructuous.
In view of the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Seema/47
Suresh Chandra Jat
Smt. Geeta Devi
Rameshwar Prasad
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
