The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the Additional Govt. Counsel submitted that prayers were already granted via a rule amendment. Pending applications were disposed of.
Infructuous petition dismissed; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/003627]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3376/2020
Prithviraj S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 55 Years, Bheruji Ki Colony, House No.191, Khempura, Udaipur, District Udaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Firoda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Bissa, AGC
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/02/2023
Learned Additional Govt. Counsel submits that this writ petition has become become infructuous in light of the prayers made and the amendment in the Rule.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file representation, in case need arises. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
188-Zeeshan
Prithviraj S/o Mohanlal
State Of Rajasthan
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
