Dismissed

Rajendra Kumar Vyas v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Jul 2023CW/334/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition filed by eleven individuals against health department officials of Rajasthan, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach respondents via representation. The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur granted permission and dismissed the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw writ petition granted with liberty to approach respondents by way of representation.

Rajendra Kumar Vyas Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:21959]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 334/2022

¶4

Rajendra Kumar Vyas S/o Shri Ram Kumar Vyas, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Chapedel, Tehsil Kothadi, District Bhilwara.

¶5

Vinayak Bhatt S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Bhatt, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Vpo Garhi, District Banswara.

¶6

Mukesh Upadhyay S/o Shri Channgan Lal Upadhyay, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Udaiwara Mohalla, Khoden Tehsil Gadhi, District Banswara.

¶7

Devendra Kumar S/o Ajab Singh, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Geeni, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶8

Rajveer Singh S/o Lakshman Singh, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Pushpa Vatika Colony, Behind Saras Circle, Bharatpur.

¶9

Arvind Kumar Acharya S/o Shri Sadan Kumar Acharya, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nandwai, Tehsil Bargun, District Chittorgarh.

¶10

Durga Prashad Yadav S/o Moolchand Yadav, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Balupura, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar.

¶11

Abdul Aziz S/o Mohd. Khan, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Zamit Pura, Tehsil Talera, District Bundi.

¶12

Rafiz Mohammad S/o Shri Shafi Mohammad, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Begun Road, Shahpura, District Bhilwara.

¶13

Hitendra Kumar Upadhyay S/o Shri Lila Ram Upadhyay, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 7/219, Shangi Nagar, In Front Of Housing Board Office, Dungarpur.

¶14

Ashok Kumar Pandiya S/o Magan Lal Pandiya, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Mukam Post Sekani, Tehsil Aspur, District Dungarpur.

¶15

----Petitioners

¶16

Versus

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶18

The Director, Department Of Medical And Health,

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:21959]

[CW-334/2022]

Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

¶23

1. Addl. Director (Admn.), Department Of Medical And Health, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

¶24

----Respondents

¶25

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Sangwa

¶26

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶27

Order

¶28

18/07/2023

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioners, after having attempted argue the matter on merit, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the respondents by way of filing a representation for the redressal of their grievances.

¶30

Permission is granted.

¶31

The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.

¶32

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶33

1-Sahenshah/-

Rajendra Kumar Vyas v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Kumar Vyas v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ras Madhur Agro Industries Bikaner Vs Municipal Council, Bikaner

M/S Capital Construction Co. Vs Union of India

Dr. Rajat Uppal Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumitra Bishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Ram Vs the State of Rajasthan