Disposes of a writ petition citing a prior order resolving res integra, noting the amnesty scheme is no longer in force and disposing mutatis mutandis barring one direction.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of order dated 14.03.2022 in SBCWP No.1964/2022 (Zabir Khan vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) mutatis mutandis barring direction No.1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/003836]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3094/2023
Haider Ali C/o Rati Mohammad, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of- House No. 241, Ward No. 15, Saini Nagar, Palwal, Haryana. Owner Of Agricultural Tractor Registration No. Hr 30 W 9487.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharma. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Dr. Ganesh Parihar, AAG. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
08/03/2023
Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the issue involved herein is no more res integra and stands resolved by an order of this Court dated 14.03.2022 in SBCWP No.1964/2022: Zabir Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters. They submit that the writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms barring the direction No.1 inasmuch as the amnesty scheme is no more in force. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsels for the respective parties and the material on record, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 14.03.2022 passed in case
[2023/RJJP/003836]
[CW-3094/2023]
(2 of 2)
of Zabir Khan (supra) which shall apply mutatis mutandis to case also barring the direction No.1.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/74(Same)
Haider Ali
State Of Rajasthan And Others
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
