The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's statement, leading to the dismissal of pending stay and other applications.
Dismissed the writ petition as infructuous; dismissed stay and other pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:19066]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2859/2019
Sapana Jain W/o Shri Vaibhav Jain, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Surashahi Chowk, Malpura, District Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manak Chand Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG with Mr. Yashodhar Pandey Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
24/08/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statements made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, the stay application and all other pending application/s, if any, also stands dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA/321
Sapana Jain
State Of Rajasthan
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
