The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. The Court noted the submission of learned counsel and disposed of all pending applications with liberty to approach the Court again if need arises.
Petitioner at liberty to approach Court again if need arises; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/016234]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2549/2023
Tejkaran Lohiya S/o Shri Krasha Chand Ji, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Ward No. 42, Ratangadh, District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Poonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Girish Sankhla
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
19/05/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous.
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.
All pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
64-nirmala/-
Tejkaran Lohiya
State Of Rajasthan
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
