Ramu Ram v. Bhagirath Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition which became infructuous due to instructions not to press the same. The court disposed of the matter accordingly without substantive hearing.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:40044]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2290/2020
Ramu Ram S/o Jesa Ram, Aged About 70 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Kasumbi Jankhla, Tehsil Ladnun District Nagaur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Rajendra Prasad S/o Ramu Ram Jat, Age 31 Years, Resident Of Kasumbi Jankhla, Tehsil Ladnun District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
- Bhagirath Ram S/o Puran Mal, By Caste Nayak, Resident Of Chhapra, Tehsil Ladnun District Nagaur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Nemi Chand S/o Jeta Ram, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Kasumbi Jankhla, Tehsil Ladnun District Nagaur
- Savar Das S/o Mool Das, By Caste Swami
- Mangi Lal S/o Ridha Ram, By Caste Brahmin
- Babu Lal S/o Ridha Ram, By Caste Brahmin
- Kishan Lal S/o Ridha Ram, By Caste Brahmin
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramu Ram S/o Jesa Ram
- respondent
Bhagirath Ram S/o Puran Mal and others
- respondent
Tehsildar, Ladnun District Nagaur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/2290/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court