Petitioners challenged notices/orders under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 via writ petition under Article 226 without exhausting the statutory appeal remedy. The Court held that the statutory appeal must be filed first.
Petition dismissed; liberty granted to file statutory appeal under the Act of 1956 within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 224/2023
[CW-224/2023]
(2 of 4)
District Ajmer.
----Petitioners
Versus
(3 of 4)
[CW-224/2023]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
15/12/2023
[CW-224/2023]
(4 of 4)
Authority is expected to hear and decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties expeditiously as early as possible, ignore the period of limitation.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Aayush Sharma/228
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners can bypass the statutory appeal against notices under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 and approach the High Court under Article 226.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamla W/o Jeevan Bhambhi and Others
State Of Rajasthan
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
