Allowed
Puran Mal v. State and Ors.
Rajasthan HCCW/2018/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
State moved application to dismiss writ petition as infructuous after petitioner's own application. Court allowed the application and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶2
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2018/2008
¶3
Puranmal S/o Shri Amarchand, aged about 42 years, R/o Maliyon Ka Mohalla Bhoopal Sagar, District Chittorgarh.
¶4
----Petitioner
¶5
Versus
¶6
- State of Rajasthan through Secondary, Department of Panchayati Raj. Secretariat Jaipur.
¶7
- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Chittorgarh. 3. Panchayat Samiti, Bhoopal Sagar, thorugh its Block Development Officer, District Chittorgarh.
¶8
- Gram Panchayat, Bhoopal Sagar through its Sarpanch Panchayat Samiti Bhoopal Sagar, District Chittorgarh. 5. Gram Panchayat Kana Kheda, through its Sarpanch, Panchayat Samiti Bhoopal Sagar, District Chittorgarh.
¶9
----Respondent
¶10
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Rajendra Prasad |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
K.K. Bissa |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Puranmal S/o Shri Amarchand
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
- respondent
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Chittorgarh
- respondent
Gram Panchayat, Bhoopal Sagar
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/2018/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court