Dismissed

Ram Singh Yadav Son of Shri Mali Ram Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Dec 2023CW/19973/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil writ petition regarding recruitment, the court accepted joint submissions that the matter was covered by a prior order in R.K. Beniwal. The petition was disposed of following the directions in that judgment concerning representation filing and state consideration, with pending applications also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of following directions in the order in R.K. Beniwal regarding representation filing and state consideration.

Ram Singh Yadav Son of Shri Mali Ram Yadav Vs State… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:39165]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19973/2023

¶4

Ram Singh Yadav Son Of Shri Mali Ram Yadav, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Raisingh Ka Bas, Govindgarh, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur Through Its Director.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Dr. Nasir Ali Naqvi, Sr.Adv.(AAG) with Mr. Syed Adeel Naqvi

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

12/12/2023

¶14

Learned counsels for the parties jointly submit that the controversy involved in the instant petition is squarely covered by the order passed this Court in the case of Rajendra Kumar Beniwal Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14080/2023) decided on 16.11.2023 along with other connected matters.

¶15

In light of such submissions, the present petition is disposed of in light of the Rajendra Kumar Beniwal (supra) with the following directions:-

¶16

“A. All the representations shall be properly organized by the State to have a

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JP:39165]

[CW-19973/2023]

proper and elaborate consideration of the same.

¶21

B. In case any of the petitioner has failed to file the representation, it shall be open for the petitioner who has filed the writ petition upto 16.11.2023, by the advertisement for the recruitment of Nursing and Paramedical Officers etc. may file such representation within a period of 20 days from today along with certified /web copy of this order.

¶22

C. Such representations shall be considered by the State while keeping into consideration the policy decision taken by the State on 03.11.2023 and the deliberations regarding the issues in question.

¶23

D. The State shall be required to take a considered stand on each of the broader controversy before publishing the final select list, after considering the grievance raised in such representations.

¶24

E. It shall be open for the petitioners to approach this Court again after the State has applied its mind on the representations and passed appropriate speaking orders strictly in accordance with law.

¶25

F. The State shall strictly adhere to the Rule 19 of the Rules of1965 while deciding all these representations.

¶26

G. The decision taken by the State shall be uploaded on the website. H. In case any issue beyond the policy decision dated 03.11.2023 also remains, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file representations within a period of 20 days from today alongwith certified/web copy of this order, which shall also be considered appropriately by the respondent-State.

¶27

I. In case the matters come back to this Court, it shall be open for the both parties to raise all their issues as this Court has not entered into the merits of the controversy while passing today’s order.”

¶28

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶29

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶30

Seema/262

Ram Singh Yadav Son of Shri Mali Ram Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Singh Yadav Son of Shri Mali Ram Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalit Kumar Rawat Vs State Education Departmentanr

Shahbuddin Vs State Dep of Education Ors.

Madan Lal Luniaandors Vs State Education Departmentors

Seema Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Mahendra Kumar Bijarnia and Anr. Vs State Panchayati Raj Ors.

Dr. Gajendra Singh Sisodia S/O Shri Mohan Singh Sisodia Vs the State of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary