The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the plea that the alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal was available. The petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to seek appropriate legal remedy.
Withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:43919]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19101/2023
Subhash Vishnoi S/o Shri Bhanaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Tuiya Ka Bas, Village Tilwasni, Tehsil Pipar, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kunal Bishnoi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Dy.S.G. Mr. Uttam Singh.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order
15/12/2023
At the very outset, on objection being taken by learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioner ought to have sought his remedy by filing appropriate petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek his appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
Disposed of accordingly with liberty as aforesaid.
(ARUN MONGA),J
270-Sumit/-
Subhash Vishnoi
The Union Of India
The All India Institute of Medical Sciences
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
