Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition challenging a transfer order which had been cancelled. The high court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of ancillary applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/012428]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1813/2023
Kumar Sambhav Awasthi S/o Shri Ganesh Dutt Awasthi, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Brahmchari Mohalla, Alwar -301001 (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pragya Seth for Mr. Vigyan Shah For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
29/05/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJP/012428]
[CW-1813/2023]
by him, has rendered infructuous. In this regard, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SACHIN/81
Kumar Sambhav Awasthi
The State Of Rajasthan
The Secretary, Local Self Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan
The Director And Special Secretary, Local Self Department
The Secretary, Urban Improvement Trust, Alwar
Balram Meena
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
