Disposed

Kheta Ram v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Dec 2023CW/17406/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition of Government employees apprehending disengagement. The Court directed the petitioner to file a representation along with specific judicial precedents and circulars within four weeks, directing the State to act thereon within eight weeks, without prejudging the representation's merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file representation along with judgment copy and circular within 4 weeks for preferential consideration within 8 weeks.

Kheta Ram Vs the State of Rajasthan — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:42460]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17406/2023

¶4

Kheta Ram S/o Girdhari Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Shivkar, Barmer, District Barmer, Presently Posting Computer Operator At Government Medical College And Hospital, Barmer, District Barmer.

¶5

Hitesh Soni S/o Amrit Lal Soni, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Juna Kerado Marg, Ward No. 7, Barmer, District Barmer Presently Posting Computer Operator At Government Medical College And Hospital, Barmer, District Barmer.

¶6

Sanjay Darji S/o Shembhu Lal Darji, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Presently Posting Men With Machine At Phc Devalpal, District Dungarpur.

¶7

Ashok Kumar S/o Toga Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Present Posting Men With Machine At Chc Sindhari, District Balotra.

¶8

Pawan Kumar S/o Fua Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Presently Posting Sawathay Marg Darshak At Chc Sindhari, District Balotra.

¶9

Paarak Singh S/o Mang Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Presently Posting Men With Machine At Chc Sindhari, District Balotra.

¶10

Kamlesh S/o Dhanraj, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Presently Posting Helper At Chc Sindahri, District Balotra.

¶11

Sangita Devi D/o Kamlesh Kumar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Presently Posting Helper At Chc Sindhari, District Balotra.

¶12

Mana Ram D/o Pukharaj, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Presently Posting Lc At Chc Sindhari, District Balotra.

¶13

Meena Devi D/o Pukharaj, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Presently Posting Lc And Chc Sindhari, District Balotra.

¶14

Dharmendra Singh S/o Narayan Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Presently Posted At Sawathay Marg Darshak At Chc Bayatu, District Balotra.

¶15

Bhanwar Lal S/o Lalu Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Presently Posting Men With Machine At Chc Bayatu, District Balotra.

(2 of 4)

[2023:RJ-JD:42460]

[CW-17406/2023]

Ajay Kumar S/o Nemichand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Presently Posting Sawathay Marg Darshak At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶20

Vinod S/o Purushotam Das, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Presently Posting Sawathay Marg Darshak At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶21

Dusyan Singh S/o Mahndra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Presently Posting Men With Machine At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶22

Anita Lkhvani D/o Ashok Kumar, Aged About 21 Years, R/ o Presently Posting Men With Machine At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶23

Shyam Lal S/o Mansha Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Presently Posting At Men With Machine At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶24

Dinesh Kumar S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Presently Posting At Men With Machine At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶25

Mahesh Kumar Bothra S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Presently Posting Pharmacist At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶26

Rakesh Kumar S/o Loonkaran Soni, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Presently Posting At Pharmacist At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶27

Umed Kumar S/o Bansi Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Presently Posting At Men With Machine At Gmc Barmer, District Barmer.

¶28

Khiya Ram S/o Achala Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Presently Posting At Men With Machine, Phc Khara, Machechan, District Barmer.

¶29

----Petitioners

¶30

Versus

¶31

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶32

Director, Public Health Medical And Health Service, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bahwan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

¶33

Joint Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of

¶34

(3 of 4) [CW-17406/2023]

¶35

[2023:RJ-JD:42460]

¶36

Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur.

¶37

Rajasthan Medical Service Corporation Department, Through Its Chairman/managing Director, Gandhi Block, Swasthya Bhawan Tilak Marg, C Scheme Jaipur.

¶38

Nodal Officer, Mndy/mnjy, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.

¶39

Chief Medical And Health Officer, Barmer.

¶40

Chief Medical And Health Officer, Balotra.

¶41

Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dungarpur.

¶42

Principal, Government Medical College And Hospital, Barmer, District Barmer.

¶43

Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Sindhari.

¶44

Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bayatu.

¶45

Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Barmer.

¶46

Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dungarpur.

¶47

----Respondents

¶48

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanwar Singh For Respondent(s) : ---

¶49

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶50

Order

¶51

06/12/2023

¶52

Petitioner’s grievance is that he was working on contract basis under the respondents and he is apprehending disengagement of his services.

¶53

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the respondents take a decision on his representation (which he would be filing) in light of the judgment dated 19.01.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Jai Prakash Ganchi & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ

[2023:RJ-JD:42460]

[CW-17406/2023]

(4 of 4)

Petition No.7273/2020) and also in light of circular dated 02.09.2020.

¶58

The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to file a representation along with photostat copy of the judgment in the case of Jai Prakash Ghanchi(supra) and photostat copy of the circular dated 02.09.2020 within a period of four weeks from today.

¶59

In case, representation is so filed, the competent authority shall do the needful, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from receipt thereof.

¶60

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶61

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶62

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the contents of representation and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought by him.

¶63

(ARUN MONGA),J

¶64

113-DhananjayS/-

Kheta Ram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kheta Ram v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Jain and Ors. Vs State and Ors.

Pradeep Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Boota Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Dr. Rakshit Ameta Vs Mohan Lal Sukhadia University and Anr.

Miss Renu Sahdev Vs State and Anr.

Jora Ram Vs the State of Rajasthan