Petitioner filed a civil writ petition. Counsel informed the bench that the matter had become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:21449]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1685/2016
Himanshi D/o Smt. Sudha Mehta, Aged About 19 Years, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Smt. Sudha Meh, 149, A.W.H.O. Colony, Ambabari, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Nagar for Mr. Shrey Gaharana
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
06/09/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/117
Himanshi D/o Smt. Sudha Mehta
Pradeep Sen S/of Late Shri Dhruvnath Sen
Smt. Sujata Das
Smt. Gopali Sarkar
Bohra Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Anukampa Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
