Dismissed

Satveer Singh S/O Bijendra Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 May 2023CW/16448/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners seeking notional benefits for LDC posts filed a writ petition. Counsel submitted that benefits were already accorded, making the petition infructuous. Respondents did not object. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.

What did the court decide?

The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

Satveer Singh S/O Bijendra Singh Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/010077]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16448/2022

¶4

Satveer Singh S/o Bijendra Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Kherli Jallo, Post Bhandara, Teshil Kaman, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

¶5

Saunu Kumar S/o Bhagat Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Mai, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

¶6

Kshetrapal S/o Sunil Dutt, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Sahana, Tehsil Uchchain, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

¶7

Manmohan Singh S/o Ramveer Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Kurka, Tehsil Uchchain, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

¶8

Hemu Singh S/o Balveer Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Kasganj, Tehsil And Po Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

¶9

Hemant Kumar S/o Prem Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Talera, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

¶10

----Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶13

The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.

¶14

The District Education Officer, Secondary-First, Bharatpur.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini

¶17

For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Raghav, AAG with Mr. Ajay Rawat

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶19

Order

¶20

10/05/2023

¶21

Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioners, seeking notional benefits for the post of LDC.

¶22

During pendency of writ petition, learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions of petitioners, submits that notional benefits have already been accorded to petitioners, hence the

(2 of 2)

[2023/RJJP/010077]

[CW-16448/2022]

relief prayed for by them has rendered infructuous. In this regard, petitioners seek permission to withdraw the instant writ petition.

¶27

Learned counsel for respondents have no objection.

¶28

In view of above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶29

Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

¶30

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶31

SACHIN/123

Satveer Singh S/O Bijendra Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satveer Singh S/O Bijendra Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar Prajapat S/O Sukhdev Kumhar Vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission

Anil Kumar S/O Ram Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Narendra Kumar Sharma S/O Ladu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Kishor Choudhary S/O Sh. Puranmal Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahadat Ali Son of Mohammed Younus Vs State of Rajasthan

Anoop Singh S/O Shyam Narayan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan