Court held that remedy for opening a road across agricultural land lies under Revenue/Tenancy Laws, not Writ jurisdiction. Petitioners directed to approach Collector/Tehsildar.
Writ petition disposed of; petitioners directed to approach Collector/Tehsildar under Revenue Laws. Stay petition and pending applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:38897]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16219/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Tak
[2023:RJ-JD:38897]
[CW-16219/2023]
(2 of 3)
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Judgment
09/11/2023
It has been submitted that respondents be restrained from opening/constructing the said new way across the agricultural land of the petitioners.
(3 of 3)
[2023:RJ-JD:38897]
[CW-16219/2023]
now. The concerned Tehsildar shall be under an obligation to take appropriate action on the same within a period of one week thereafter.
(REKHA BORANA),J
122-KashishS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking restrain er from opening a road across agricultural land is maintainable.
Gepar Ram S/o Kishna Ram and Others
State Of Rajasthan
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
