A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor any advocate appeared before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:16340]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1600/2021
Manmohan Arora S/o Shri Harbans Lal Arora, Aged About 44 Years, Advocate, 99, Vivek Vihar Colony, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Public Information Officer Cum Additional Superintendent Of Police, Chief Hq, Kota City, Kota, Rajasthan.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
02/08/2023
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round.
Therefore, the present writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, all other pending application/s, if any, also stands dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Seema/251
Manmohan Arora
State Public Information Officer Cum Additional Superintendent Of Police
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
