The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. All pending applications were also dismissed without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1592/2009
01- jktsUnz flag iq= Jh uUn flag pkSgku
egkea=h]
vkbZvkbZ,l baLVhV;w~”kuy usVodZ deZpkjh ;wfu;u] 42] iVsy dksyksuh] ljnkj iVsy ekxZ] t;iqj
02-+ tqxy flag iq= Jh cnzh flag 03- Hkokuh flag iq= Jh :i flag 04- jkethyky cSjok iq= Jh /kwykjke 05- “kSrku flag iq= Jh j?kqohj flag 06- Hkxorh flag iq= Jh Hkaoj flag 07- xksiky yky iq= Jh Hkaoj yky lSuh 08- enu flag iq= Jh dku flag 09- rtsanz flag iq= Jh iUuk yky 10- j?kqohj flag iq= Jh ykspu flag 11- psru dqekj iq= Jh ykspu flag 12- eUuk yky ;kno iq= Jh dkUgk jke ;kno 13- ekye flag iq= Jh vuksi flag 14- txUukFk flag iq= Jh ykspu flag 15- Hkhe flag iq= Jh :i flag ;kph dzekad 2 ls 15 rd lHkh }kjk Jh _’kHk pUn tSu] 80] ctjax fogkj] xksikyiqjk jsyosiqy ds ikl t;iqjA
;kphx.k
Ckuke
01- jktLFkku ljdkj] tfj; s izeq[k “kklu lfpo] Je foHkkx] jktLFkku ljdkj] “kklu lfpoky;] t;iqjA 02- Je vk;qDr] Je foHkkx] jktLFkku] aJe Hkou] ,u-ch-lh- ds lkeus] “kkfUr uxj] gluiqjk] t;iqjA 03- izkf/kdkjh] osru Hkqxrku vf/kfu;e t;iqj “kgj] t;iqj dk;kZy; % laHkkxh; la;qDr zJe vk;qDr ] t;iqj lEHkkx] Je Hkou] “kkfUr uxj] gluiqjk] t;iqjA 04- la;qDr Je vk;qDr] ¼vkbZ-vkj-½] Je foHkkx] jktLFkku] Je Hkou]
[CW-1592/2009]
(2 of 2)
,u-ch-lh- ds lkeu as ] “kkfUr uxj] gluiqjk] t;iqjA 05- funs”kd] bf.M;k bUVjusa”kuy Ldwy] xq:dqy ekxZ] ,l-,Q-,l- ekuljksoj] t;iqjA 06- funs”kd] vkbZvkbZ,l baLVhV~;w”kuy usVodZ] xq:dqy ekxZ] ,l-,Q-,l- ekuljksoj] t;iqjA 07- funs”kd@ lsadzsVjh tujy] bf.M;u dkafly Qkj bUVjysa”kuy ,feVh] vkbZ-vkbZ-,l- dSEil] xq:dqy ekxZ] ,l-,Q-,l- ekuljksoj] t;iqjA
IzkR;FkhZx.k
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tej Pratap Singh for Mr. A.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
21/09/2023
Counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/110
State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan State Electricity Board
Umesh Kumar
Vijay Kumar
Shrivardhan Lal
Ajay Kumar
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
