Partly allowed

Priyanka Chouhan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jan 2023CW/1440/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a Special Bonafide Resident Certificate (TSP Area). Court relied on precedents and directed respondents to issue the certificate or pass a speaking order rejecting it within seven days.

What did the court decide?

Respondents No.2 & 3 directed to issue Special Bonafide Resident Certificate or pass speaking order within 7 days of receipt of petitioner's documents.

Priyanka Chouhan Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1440/2023

¶3

Priyanka Chouhan D/o Ramesh Chouhan, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Tali Gali Ward No. 6, Pratapgarh, Tehsil Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Deputy Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶7

The Sub Divisional Officer, Pratapgarh, Tehsil Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).

¶8

Tehsildar, Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh (Raj.).

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.S.Champawat.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶12

Order

¶13

23/01/2023

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decisions of this court in Chand Kanwar v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1627/2022, decided on 02.02.2022 and Anita Suthar V. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5450/2021, decided on 19.01.2022 and therefore, the present writ petition may also be ordered to be decided in light of the said judgments.

¶15

In view of above submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CW-1440/2023]

¶18

“1. The respondent Nos.2 & 3 are directed to issue Special Bonafide Resident Certificate (TSP Area) to the petitioner in accordance with law. If the respondents are of the view that the petitioner is not entitled for grant of Special Bonafide Resident Certificate (TSP Area), they shall pass a speaking order and send the same to the petitioner.

¶19

For the purpose aforesaid, the petitioner shall furnish a representation along with the certified copy of the order instant and the photostat copy of the application, she claims to have filed. On receipt of the same, the Tehsildar concerned shall do the needful within a period of 7 days.

¶20

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.”

¶21

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

393-/Anil Singh/-

Priyanka Chouhan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanka Chouhan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurukripa Paramedical College Vs State of Rajasthan

Namrita Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Nand Lal Vs Ravindra

Madan Lal Khatik Vs State of Rajasthan

Maharaja Agarsen College of Nursing of Nursing Vs State of Rajasthan

Ruplal Vs State of Rajasthan