In this writ petition challenging Question No.78 of the answer key for the Village Development Officer recruitment, the Bench relied on a connected judgment rejecting the same challenge. The petition was dismissed without any costs.
The writ petition is dismissed with no costs; stay application is also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14147/2022
----Petitioners
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Preetam Singh for Mr. Aayush Mall For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
08/08/2023
This writ petition has been filed by petitioners challenging question No.78 of answer key dated 29-7-2022 pursuant to Advertisement dated 6-9-2021 for the post of Village Development Officer issued by the Rajasthan Staff Selection Board and have claimed appointment on the post in question.
(2 of 2)
[CW-14147/2022]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
Arn/65
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the validity of Question No.78 of the answer key for the Village Development Officer post should be upheld in light of the decision in Kushal Bhardwaj.
Whether the writ petition challenging the answer key requires any further relief.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kushal Bhardwaj Vs. State of RajasthanRelied on¶20
SBCWP No.11616/2022, Kushal Bhardwaj Vs. State of Rajasthan
Sahil S/o Mansingh
Karan Anjana S/o Ratana Ram
Anita Dodiyar D/o Ramchand Dodiyar
The State Of Rajasthan
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
