Rajnee v. R P S C Ajmer
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur dismissed two connected writ petitions as infructuous due to the efflux of time.
What did the court decide?
Petitions dismissed as infructuous; stay applications dismissed.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JP:20335]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13123/2014
Rajnee S/o Gopal Lal Saini, aged about 31 years, R/o H-588, Near Bank of baroda, Kabir Marg, bani Park, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11789/2014
Moti Ram Saini S/o Reja Ram Saini, aged about 28 years, R/o Dhani Ramukala, Village & Post Chhapoli, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu.
----Petitioner
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajnee S/o Gopal Lal Saini
- respondent
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
- petitioner
Moti Ram Saini S/o Reja Ram Saini
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/13123/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court