The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed a writ petition challenging an office order terminating the petitioner's services, holding that without a direct contract, the placement agency alone could challenge such an order.
Petition dismissed; stay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/002535]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1244/2023
Ronak Kumar S/o Shri Mahesh Kumar Ji, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Shiv Vatika Colony, Sumerpur, District Pali (Raj.).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Ballani
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
27/01/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJD/002535]
[CW-1244/2023]
decision to bring an end to the services of placement agency in wake of the financial constraints being faced by the Municipal Board.
the respondent – Municipal Board. Hence, no writ cant lie, that too in absence of the placement agency.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
534-akansha/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner engaged through a placement agency can challenge an order bringing his services to an end directly against the municipal board due to lack of privity of contract.
Ronak Kumar S/o Shri Mahesh Kumar Ji
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department
The Municipal Board, Sumerpur
The Chairman, Municipal Board, Sumerpur
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
