The writ petitioner was represented by counsel who pleaded no instructions from the client. Acting on this submission, the court dismissed the writ petition. No detailed reasoning or substantive decision on the merits is provided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:21601]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1154/2015
Kirti Sharma W/o Shri Neeraj Sharma, 33 State Bank Colony, Near Jaipur House, Distt. Agra Uttar Pradesh.
----Petitioner
| ----Respondents | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vinod Singhal |
|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
11/09/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has pleaded no instructions on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/70
Kirti Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
