The petitioner abandoned the present writ petition before hearing. The Court, considering that the petition was not pressed, dismissed it forthwith. There are no legal propositions of general application derived from this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1132/2006
Vijendra Raj Mehta S/o Shri Late Kanak Raj Mehta, 3890, Laxmi Bhawan, M.s.b. Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar, Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anita Agarwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
11/01/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/47
Vijendra Raj Mehta
Union Of India, Through The Chairman, Securities And Exchange Board Of India
Jaipur Stock Exchange Limied
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
