High Court at Jodhpur disposed of a writ petition by directing petitioners to file representation within four weeks. Respondents must consider it within six weeks but are not ordered to decide in a specific manner.
Direction to file representation within four weeks; respondents to consider within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1074/2023
(2 of 4)
[CW-1074/2023]
----Petitioners
Versus
(3 of 4)
[CW-1074/2023]
Swasthya Bhawan Tilak Marg, C Scheme Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanwar Singh
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
18/01/2023
(4 of 4) [CW-1074/2023]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
211-akansha/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be directed to file representation for consideration under previous precedent.
Whether a direction to consider representation constitutes a mandatory order to decide it in a specific manner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Referred¶0
Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 953/2017
Amit Kumar Trivedi & Ors.
State Of Rajasthan
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
