Petitioner withdrew the writ petition as it had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition on that ground.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1073/2015
Vinod Wadhwani S/o Shri Harish Chandra Wadhwani, Anand Corporation Bhawan, Sabji Mandi, Kota Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
18/01/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present writ petition as it has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
JKP/12
Vinod Wadhwani S/o Shri Harish Chandra Wadhwani
Ramesh Chand Chittora S/o Heera Lal Chittora
Jagdish S/o Manna Lal Meena
The New India Assurance Company Limited Through Zonal Manager, Zonal Office At Jhalawar Road, Kota Raj.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
