Petitioner in this writ petition withdrew the petition following an amicable settlement and execution of a joint affidavit by both parties. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:36875]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1047/2015
Smt. Antari Devi W/o Punmaram, By caste Meghwal, Aged about 59 years, Resident of Goliyar, Tehsil Chohtan, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Panwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Tanwar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
01/11/2023
Mention has been made by the learned counsel for both the parties that they have amicably settled their differences and have executed an affidavit to the effect that in view of the compromise, the petitioner does not wish to press the petition and seeks to withdraw the same.
Allowed as prayed for.
The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
The affidavits of both the parties be filed in the Registry.
(ARUN MONGA),J
289-Shahenshah/Divya-
Smt. Antari Devi W/o Punmaram
Chunni Lal S/o Laxman Ram
Ashok Kumar Bose S/o Shri Prabhu Ram
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
