Allowed

Mamta v. Saurabh Singh Rao

Rajasthan HC21 Apr 2023CTA/90/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan allowed a Civil Transfer Application. The court relied on socio-economic principles for transfer in matrimonial matters and ordered the transfer of a suit via Section 39 R.C.C.A., 2020 to the Judicial Commissioner's court at Jodhpur, directing service of notice to the judicial commissioner within fifteen days.

What did the court decide?

The transfer application is allowed. The suit is ordered to be transferred to the Principal Civil Judge, Jodhpur under Section 39 R.C.C.A., 2020.

Mamta Vs Saurabh Singh Rao — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/011341]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 90/2020

¶4

Mamta W/o Saurabh Singh Rao, Aged About 30 Years, D/o Shri Ridmal Ji, R/o Manpura Colony, Distt. Jalore.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Saurabh Singh Rao S/o Ajit Singh, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Rao, R/o Hariom Nagar, Behind Govt. Hospital, Sadri, Distt. Pali.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. BS Rathore
For Respondent(s)	: None

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order

¶11

21/04/2023

¶12

1- izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA bl ekeys esa ftyk ikyh ds nSfud lekpkj i= tks fd lknMh esa Hkh izlkfjr gksrk gS] ds fnukad 20-03-2023 ds ist la[;k 8 esa bl U;k;ky; ds uksfVl izdkf'kr gks pqds gSaA fnukad 20-03-2023 ds i'pkr vkt fnu rd izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha vk;k gSA v[kckj esa lk;k gksus ds i'pkr ,d ekg dh vof/k O;rhr gks tkus ds ckotwn dksbZ mifLFkr ugha vkus ls rkehy i;kZIr gksuk ekuk tkrk gSA

¶13

2- ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkfFkZ;k dh vksj ls ;g LFkkukUrj.k ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 24 lh-ih-lh vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ckyh dsEi nslwjh] ftyk ikyh esa yafcr izdj.k la[;k 39@2020 ^^lkSjHk jko cuke Jherh eerk^^ dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA

¶14

3- ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkfFkZ;k dks lquk x;kA ;ksX; vf/koDRkk izkfFkZ;k }kjk mDr izdj.k vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ckyh dsEi nslwjh] ftyk ikyh ls ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;h vkSj ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd bl ekeys esa ,QvkbZvkj la[;k 21@2020 fnukad 14-08-2020 efgyk iqfylFkkuk tkyksj esa is'k dj j[kh gSA tkyksj ls vfrfjDr ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] ckyh ftyk ikyh

[2023/RJJD/011341]

[CTA-90/2020]

(2 of 3)

dh nwjh djhc 80&90 fdyksehVj gSA izkFkhZ;k ds firk dSalj ls ihfM+r gksuk rFkk izkFkhZ;k ?kjsyq efgyk gksuk] ftldh dksbZ vkenuh ugha gksuk crk;h x;h gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izkfFkZ;k us Hkh ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] tkyksj esa izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 125 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk is'k dj j[kk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izdj.k vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ckyh dsEi nslwjh] ftyk ikyh ls ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

4- ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkfFkZ;k ds rdksaZ ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA bl ekeys esa U;k;ky; vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ckyh dsEi nslwjh] ftyk ikyh esa yafcr izdj.k dh izekf.kr izfr vfHkys[k ij is'k dh x;h gS vkSj ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj ds le{k yafcr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 125 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk dh izekf.kr izfr vfHkys[k ij layXu gSA izkfFkZ;k ds }kjk Lo;a dh vk; dk dksbZ lk/ku ugha gksuk crk;k x;k gSA

¶20

5- vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gqvk gS vkSj u gh mldh vksj ls dksbZ tokc is'k gqvk gSA 6- ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A.S.Saravana Karthik Sha (Civil Appeal No.4894/2022

¶21

arising out of SLP (C) No.16465/2021) decided on 18.7.2022, esa fuEu fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS %&

¶22

“9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socio-economic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife’s convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.”

[2023/RJJD/011341]

[CTA-90/2020]

(3 of 3)

7- ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk izfrikfnr mijksDr fl}kUrksa dh jks'kuh esa ekeys ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks en~nsutj j[krs gq, izkfFkZ;k dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶27

8- ifj.kker% izkfFkZ;k dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 24 lh-ih-lhLohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ckyh dsEi nslwjh] ftyk ikyh ds le{k yafcr izdj.k la[;k 39@2020 vUrxZr /kkjk 11 fgUnq fookg vf/kfu;e ^^ lkSjHk jko cuke Jherh eerk^^ dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj] esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ckyh dsEi nslwjh] ftyk ikyh dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;kph vFkok mlds vf/koDrk dks lwfpr djrs gq, mDr izdj.k ds leLr nLrkost ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj] dks rqjUr izHkko ls izsf"kr djsA mHk; i{kdkjku dks fnukad 15-05-2021 dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj ds le{k mifLFkr gksus dk funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gSA vkns'k dh izfr vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k ckyh dsEi nslwjh] ftyk ikyh ,oa ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; tkyksj dks fHktok;h tkosA

¶28

9- mijksDrkuqlkj ;g LFkkukUrj.k ;kfpdk o LFkxu ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA

¶29

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶30

39-S N LOHRA/-

Mamta v. Saurabh Singh Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamta v. Saurabh Singh Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishore Kumar Vs Smt. Shanti Devi and Ors.

Jodhpur V.V.N. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Smt. Samju Devi and Ors.

Lrs of Sardul Singh Vs State and Ors.

Smt. Santoshi Devi Vs Gopal Lal and Ors.

Narayan Bhiwani Vs Bhanwara Ram and Ors.

Dungar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan