Shailbala v. Rahul Tak
Case brief
What is this about?
Bequeathed transfer application filed by Shailbala seeking to shift a writ petition challenging non-issuance of pension benefits from Jaipur to Jodhpur Bench. The shift was allowed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was transferred from High Court, Jaipur Bench to the High Court, Jodhpur Bench for hearing on merits.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:19375]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 162/2022
Shailbala W/o Rahul Tak, Aged About 34 Years, D/o Shri Yogendra Singh Verma, R/o Aalasan, Distt. Jalore.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rahul Tak S/o Shri Ram Gopal Tak, R/o Falna Tehsil Bali Distt. Pali.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Parwat Singh Rathore |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mohit Sharma |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Judgment
03/07/2023
izkfFkZ;k dh vksj ls ;g LFkkukUrj.k ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 24 lh-ih-lhvizkFkhZ dh vksj ls ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; vij ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] ckyh] ikyh esa yafcr izdj.k la[;k 60@2020 ^^jkgqy Vkd cuke 'kSyckyk** dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] tkykSj esa LFkkukUrfjr fd, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh xbZ gSA i{kdkjku ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k us lgefr ls mDr izdj.k vij ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] ckyh] ikyh ls ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] tkykSj esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to transfer the writ petition concerning denial of pensionary benefits from the High Court, Jaipur Bench to this Bench.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shailbala W/o Rahul Tak, Aged About 34 Years, D/o Shri Yogendra Singh Verma
- respondent
Rahul Tak S/o Shri Ram Gopal Tak
Coram
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CTA/162/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court